Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Heather Mae French vs Nicole Wilkins

Heather Mae French
Heather Mae French
0 5
5 head-to-head meetings
Nicole Wilkins
Nicole Wilkins
Athlete A
Heather Mae French
Heather Mae French
United States Women's Figure
Athlete B
Nicole Wilkins
Nicole Wilkins
United States Women's Figure
5 Shared Contests
2008 First Meeting
2010 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 21, 2026

Heather Mae French vs Nicole Wilkins head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
5
Heather Mae French
0 ahead
Nicole Wilkins
5 ahead
Span
2008–2010
At the Olympia
Heather Mae French 0–3 Nicole Wilkins in 3

In 5 meetings, Nicole Wilkins finished ahead of Heather Mae French 5 times to 0, including 3 at the Figure Olympia.

Every contest Heather Mae French and Nicole Wilkins both entered

Year Contest Division Heather Mae French Nicole Wilkins Winner
2010 Ms International Women's Figure #3 #1 Nicole Wilkins
2010 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #3 #2 Nicole Wilkins
2009 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #3 #1 Nicole Wilkins
2008 Pittsburgh Pro Women's Figure #4 #2 Nicole Wilkins
2008 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #10 #9 Nicole Wilkins

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Heather Mae French and Nicole Wilkins meet that test 5 times. For scale, this database holds 20 recorded results for Heather Mae French and 28 for Nicole Wilkins across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 21, 2026.

Heather Mae French and Nicole Wilkins at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Heather Mae French reached her competitive peak from 2005 to 2006, one of her strongest stretches (67% win rate across 3 contests in the window).

Nicole Wilkins reached her competitive peak from 2009 to 2014 (6 years), winning 4 Olympia titles in Women's Figure.

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Nicole Wilkins, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

Olympia titles in 2009, 2011, 2013 and 2014, with runner-up finishes in 2010, 2012 and 2015. Eight years in the top two of the division, and she won it in her second appearance.

The Figure International followed in 2010, 2011 and 2012, and she took the Arnold Classic figure title in 2012, a season in which she also won the Ms. International.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.