Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Jennifer Taylor vs Latorya Neisha Watts

Jennifer Taylor
Jennifer Taylor
0 6
6 head-to-head meetings
Latorya Neisha Watts
Latorya Neisha Watts
Athlete A
Jennifer Taylor
Jennifer Taylor
United States Women's Physique
Athlete B
Latorya Neisha Watts
Latorya Neisha Watts
United States Women's Figure
6 Shared Contests
2013 First Meeting
2016 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 23, 2026

Jennifer Taylor vs Latorya Neisha Watts head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
6
Jennifer Taylor
0 ahead
Latorya Neisha Watts
6 ahead
Span
2013–2016
At the Olympia
Jennifer Taylor 0–2 Latorya Neisha Watts in 2

In 6 meetings, Latorya Neisha Watts finished ahead of Jennifer Taylor 6 times to 0, including 2 at the Figure Olympia.

Every contest Jennifer Taylor and Latorya Neisha Watts both entered

Year Contest Division Jennifer Taylor Latorya Neisha Watts Winner
2016 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #10 #1 Latorya Neisha Watts
2015 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #16 #1 Latorya Neisha Watts
2014 IFBB Tournament of Champions Women's Figure #6 #4 Latorya Neisha Watts
2014 IFBB Tampa Pro Women's Figure #15 #1 Latorya Neisha Watts
2013 Tampa Pro Women's Figure #12 #4 Latorya Neisha Watts
2013 Tampa Pro Championships Women's Figure #12 #4 Latorya Neisha Watts

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Jennifer Taylor and Latorya Neisha Watts meet that test 6 times. For scale, this database holds 49 recorded results for Jennifer Taylor and 27 for Latorya Neisha Watts across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 23, 2026.

Jennifer Taylor and Latorya Neisha Watts at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Jennifer Taylor reached her competitive peak from 2009 to 2010, one of her strongest stretches (20% win rate across 5 contests in the window).

Latorya Neisha Watts reached her competitive peak from 2015 to 2016 (2 years), winning 2 Olympia titles in Women's Figure.

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Latorya Neisha Watts, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

Back-to-back Figure Olympia titles in 2015 and 2016, second place in 2017 and again in 2019, and fifth on her first appearance in 2014 and her last in 2020. Six Olympia appearances, four of them in the top two.

2016 is the season that defines the record. She won the Olympia, the Ms. International and the Arnold Classic Australia, then added the Arnold Classic Brasil in 2017. Winning the Olympia and the Arnold's own figure title in the same year is the closest the division has to a sweep.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.