Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Kim Chizevsky vs Laura Creavalle

Kim Chizevsky
Kim Chizevsky
6 3
9 head-to-head meetings
Laura Creavalle
Laura Creavalle
Athlete A
Kim Chizevsky
Kim Chizevsky
United States Women's Figure
Athlete B
Laura Creavalle
Laura Creavalle
British Guiana Women's Bodybuilding
9 Shared Contests
1993 First Meeting
1999 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 21, 2026

Kim Chizevsky vs Laura Creavalle head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
9
Kim Chizevsky
6 ahead
Laura Creavalle
3 ahead
Span
1993–1999
At the Olympia
Kim Chizevsky 5–1 Laura Creavalle in 6

In 9 meetings, Kim Chizevsky finished ahead of Laura Creavalle 6 times to 3, including 6 at the Ms. Olympia.

Every contest Kim Chizevsky and Laura Creavalle both entered

Year Contest Division Kim Chizevsky Laura Creavalle Winner
1999 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #1 #3 Kim Chizevsky
1998 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #1 #5 Kim Chizevsky
1997 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #1 #4 Kim Chizevsky
1996 Ms International Women's Bodybuilding #1 #2 Kim Chizevsky
1996 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #1 #4 Kim Chizevsky
1995 Ms International Women's Bodybuilding #2 #1 Laura Creavalle
1995 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #2 #5 Kim Chizevsky
1994 Ms International Women's Bodybuilding #5 #1 Laura Creavalle
1993 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #5 #3 Laura Creavalle

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Kim Chizevsky and Laura Creavalle meet that test 9 times. For scale, this database holds 14 recorded results for Kim Chizevsky and 27 for Laura Creavalle across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 21, 2026.

Kim Chizevsky and Laura Creavalle at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Kim Chizevsky reached her competitive peak from 1996 to 1999 (4 years), winning 4 Olympia titles in Women's Bodybuilding.

Laura Creavalle reached her competitive peak from 1985 to 1987, one of her strongest stretches (25% win rate across 4 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Kim Chizevsky and Laura Creavalle, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

Kim Chizevsky

Four consecutive Ms. Olympia titles, and she was runner-up in 1995 the year before the run started. Six Olympia appearances in total and she was never lower than fifth.

She won the Ms. International in 1993, three years before her first Olympia title, and again in 1996 in the same season as it.

Laura Creavalle

Ms. International titles in 1990, 1994 and 1995, and an Olympia record that almost never left the top six: third in 1991, second in 1992, third in 1993, second in 1994, third in 1999.

Thirteen Olympia appearances between 1988 and 2002 is one of the longest runs the division has had.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.