Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Latorya Neisha Watts vs Nadia Wyatt

Latorya Neisha Watts
Latorya Neisha Watts
2 1
3 head-to-head meetings
Nadia Wyatt
Nadia Wyatt
Athlete A
Latorya Neisha Watts
Latorya Neisha Watts
United States Women's Figure
Athlete B
Nadia Wyatt
Nadia Wyatt
United States Women's Figure
3 Shared Contests
2016 First Meeting
2020 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 21, 2026

Latorya Neisha Watts vs Nadia Wyatt head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
3
Latorya Neisha Watts
2 ahead
Nadia Wyatt
1 ahead
Span
2016–2020
At the Olympia
Latorya Neisha Watts 2–1 Nadia Wyatt in 3

In 3 meetings, Latorya Neisha Watts finished ahead of Nadia Wyatt 2 times to 1, including 3 at the Figure Olympia.

Every contest Latorya Neisha Watts and Nadia Wyatt both entered

Year Contest Division Latorya Neisha Watts Nadia Wyatt Winner
2020 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #5 #3 Nadia Wyatt
2019 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #2 #3 Latorya Neisha Watts
2016 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #1 #16 Latorya Neisha Watts

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Latorya Neisha Watts and Nadia Wyatt meet that test 3 times. For scale, this database holds 27 recorded results for Latorya Neisha Watts and 24 for Nadia Wyatt across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 21, 2026.

Latorya Neisha Watts and Nadia Wyatt at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Latorya Neisha Watts reached her competitive peak from 2015 to 2016 (2 years), winning 2 Olympia titles in Women's Figure.

Nadia Wyatt reached her competitive peak from 2014 to 2015, one of her strongest stretches (14% win rate across 7 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Latorya Neisha Watts and Nadia Wyatt, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

Latorya Neisha Watts

Back-to-back Figure Olympia titles in 2015 and 2016, second place in 2017 and again in 2019, and fifth on her first appearance in 2014 and her last in 2020. Six Olympia appearances, four of them in the top two.

2016 is the season that defines the record. She won the Olympia, the Ms. International and the Arnold Classic Australia, then added the Arnold Classic Brasil in 2017. Winning the Olympia and the Arnold's own figure title in the same year is the closest the division has to a sweep.

Nadia Wyatt

Three consecutive Olympia bronzes is the record, bracketed by sixteenth places in 2016 and 2021. The middle of the career is entirely top-three and the ends are nowhere near it.

She won the Optimum Classic in 2016 and the St. Louis Pro in 2018, and was runner-up at the St. Louis Pro in 2017 and the Arnold Classic in 2019.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.