Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Agnese Russo vs Kim Clark

Agnese Russo
Agnese Russo
7 4
12 head-to-head meetings
Kim Clark
Kim Clark
Athlete A
Agnese Russo
Agnese Russo
Canada Women's Figure
Athlete B
Kim Clark
Kim Clark
United States Women's Figure
12 Shared Contests
1 Ties
2014 First Meeting
2018 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Agnese Russo vs Kim Clark head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
12
Agnese Russo
7 ahead
Kim Clark
4 ahead
Ties
1
Span
2014–2018

In 12 meetings, Agnese Russo finished ahead of Kim Clark 7 times to 4.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Agnese Russo Kim Clark Winner
2018 IFBB Tampa Pro Women's Figure #12 #2 Kim Clark
2017 IFBB Greater Gulf States Women's Figure #13 #17 Agnese Russo
2016 IFBB Toronto Pro Supershow Women's Figure #8 #9 Agnese Russo
2016 Los Angeles Pro Women's Figure #4 #2 Kim Clark
2016 Los Angeles Pro Women's Figure #10 #5 Kim Clark
2016 Toronto Pro Women's Figure #8 #9 Agnese Russo
2016 San Marino Pro Women's Figure #5 #8 Agnese Russo
2015 IFBB Wings of Strength Chicago Pro Women's Figure #2 #3 Agnese Russo
2015 Chicago Pro Championships Women's Figure #2 #3 Agnese Russo
2014 IFBB St Louis Pro Women's Figure #17 #17 Tie
2014 IFBB Europa Phoenix Women's Figure #16 #18 Agnese Russo
2014 Kentucky Pro Women's Figure #14 #6 Kim Clark

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Agnese Russo
7
Wins Head-to-Head
12 shared contests
Kim Clark
4
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Agnese Russo Kim Clark Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →