Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Anton Antipov vs Jason Poston

Anton Antipov
Anton Antipov
1 8
9 head-to-head meetings
Jason Poston
Jason Poston
Athlete A
Anton Antipov
Anton Antipov
United States Men's Physique
Athlete B
Jason Poston
Jason Poston
United States Men's Physique
9 Shared Contests
2012 First Meeting
2016 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Anton Antipov vs Jason Poston head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
9
Anton Antipov
1 ahead
Jason Poston
8 ahead
Span
2012–2016
At the Olympia
Anton Antipov 0–4 Jason Poston in 4

In 9 meetings, Jason Poston finished ahead of Anton Antipov 8 times to 1, including 4 Mr. Olympia showdowns.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Anton Antipov Jason Poston Winner
2016 Mr. Olympia Men's Physique #16 #7 Jason Poston
2015 Mr. Olympia Men's Physique #9 #3 Jason Poston
2014 IFBB Pittsburgh Pro Men's Physique #4 #2 Jason Poston
2014 IFBB New York Pro Men's Physique #6 #1 Jason Poston
2014 Mr. Olympia Men's Physique #7 #3 Jason Poston
2013 IFBB Pittsburgh Pro Men's Physique #6 #2 Jason Poston
2013 Mr. Olympia Men's Physique #12 #5 Jason Poston
2013 IFBB Europa Show of Champions Men's Physique #4 #8 Anton Antipov
2012 Houston Pro Men's Physique #6 #3 Jason Poston

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Anton Antipov
1
Wins Head-to-Head
9 shared contests
Jason Poston
8
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Anton Antipov Jason Poston Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →