Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Christine Pomponio-Pate vs Amber Littlejohn

Christine Pomponio-Pate
Christine Pomponio-Pate
1 5
6 head-to-head meetings
AL
Amber Littlejohn
Athlete A
Christine Pomponio-Pate
Christine Pomponio-Pate
United States Women's Figure
Athlete B
AL
Amber Littlejohn
United States Women's Figure
6 Shared Contests
2004 First Meeting
2006 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Christine Pomponio-Pate vs Amber Littlejohn head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
6
Christine Pomponio-Pate
1 ahead
Amber Littlejohn
5 ahead
Span
2004–2006
At the Olympia
Christine Pomponio-Pate 0–3 Amber Littlejohn in 3

In 6 meetings, Amber Littlejohn finished ahead of Christine Pomponio-Pate 5 times to 1, including 3 Mr. Olympia showdowns.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Christine Pomponio-Pate Amber Littlejohn Winner
2006 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #4 #2 Amber Littlejohn
2005 Ms International Women's Figure #4 #6 Christine Pomponio-Pate
2005 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #6 #4 Amber Littlejohn
2004 Show of Strength Pro Championship Women's Figure #4 #3 Amber Littlejohn
2004 California Pro Women's Figure #6 #3 Amber Littlejohn
2004 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #6 #5 Amber Littlejohn

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Christine Pomponio-Pate
1
Wins Head-to-Head
6 shared contests
Amber Littlejohn
5
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Christine Pomponio-Pate Amber Littlejohn Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →