Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Jason Arntz vs Dexter Jackson

Jason Arntz
Jason Arntz
0 9
9 head-to-head meetings
Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson
Athlete A
Jason Arntz
Jason Arntz
United States Men's 212 Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Dexter Jackson
Dexter Jackson
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
9 Shared Contests
1996 First Meeting
2004 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Jason Arntz vs Dexter Jackson head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
9
Jason Arntz
0 ahead
Dexter Jackson
9 ahead
Span
1996–2004

In 9 meetings, Dexter Jackson finished ahead of Jason Arntz 9 times to 0.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Jason Arntz Dexter Jackson Winner
2004 Ironman Pro Invitational Men's Open Bodybuilding #11 #1 Dexter Jackson
2002 San Francisco Pro Men's Open Bodybuilding #8 #3 Dexter Jackson
2001 Arnold Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #13 #5 Dexter Jackson
2000 Toronto Pro Men's Open Bodybuilding #7 #2 Dexter Jackson
2000 Night of Champions Men's Open Bodybuilding #10 #8 Dexter Jackson
2000 Ironman Pro Invitational Men's Open Bodybuilding #6 #3 Dexter Jackson
2000 Arnold Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #8 #5 Dexter Jackson
1999 Night of Champions Men's Open Bodybuilding #12 #3 Dexter Jackson
1996 Nationals Men's Open Bodybuilding #7 #6 Dexter Jackson

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Jason Arntz
0
Wins Head-to-Head
9 shared contests
Dexter Jackson
9
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Jason Arntz Dexter Jackson Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →