Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Shalako Bradberry vs Karen Noorlun

Shalako Bradberry
Shalako Bradberry
7 2
9 head-to-head meetings
Karen Noorlun
Karen Noorlun
Athlete A
Shalako Bradberry
Shalako Bradberry
United States Women's Figure
Athlete B
Karen Noorlun
Karen Noorlun
United States Women's Figure
9 Shared Contests
2014 First Meeting
2016 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Shalako Bradberry vs Karen Noorlun head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
9
Shalako Bradberry
7 ahead
Karen Noorlun
2 ahead
Span
2014–2016
At the Olympia
Shalako Bradberry 1–0 Karen Noorlun in 1

In 9 meetings, Shalako Bradberry finished ahead of Karen Noorlun 7 times to 2, including 1 Mr. Olympia showdown.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Shalako Bradberry Karen Noorlun Winner
2016 Los Angeles Pro Women's Figure #6 #2 Karen Noorlun
2015 IFBB Omaha Pro Women's Figure #9 #14 Shalako Bradberry
2015 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #15 #16 Shalako Bradberry
2015 IFBB Los Angeles Championships Women's Figure #2 #3 Shalako Bradberry
2015 IFBB Border States Women's Figure #4 #7 Shalako Bradberry
2015 Tahoe Pro Women's Figure #5 #8 Shalako Bradberry
2015 Border States Pro Women's Figure #4 #7 Shalako Bradberry
2014 California State Women's Figure #4 #8 Shalako Bradberry
2014 Border States Women's Figure #4 #2 Karen Noorlun

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Shalako Bradberry
7
Wins Head-to-Head
9 shared contests
Karen Noorlun
2
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Shalako Bradberry Karen Noorlun Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →