Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Valerie Waugaman vs Chastity Layne Slone

Valerie Waugaman
Valerie Waugaman
4 1
5 head-to-head meetings
Chastity Layne Slone
Chastity Layne Slone
Athlete A
Valerie Waugaman
Valerie Waugaman
United States Women's Figure
Athlete B
Chastity Layne Slone
Chastity Layne Slone
United States Women's Figure
5 Shared Contests
2005 First Meeting
2007 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Valerie Waugaman vs Chastity Layne Slone head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
5
Valerie Waugaman
4 ahead
Chastity Layne Slone
1 ahead
Span
2005–2007
At the Olympia
Valerie Waugaman 2–0 Chastity Layne Slone in 2

In 5 meetings, Valerie Waugaman finished ahead of Chastity Layne Slone 4 times to 1, including 2 Mr. Olympia showdowns.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Valerie Waugaman Chastity Layne Slone Winner
2007 Ms International Women's Figure #5 #7 Valerie Waugaman
2007 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #9 #15 Valerie Waugaman
2007 Colorado Pro Championships Women's Figure #1 #10 Valerie Waugaman
2006 Ms International Women's Figure #8 #4 Chastity Layne Slone
2005 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #7 #11 Valerie Waugaman

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Valerie Waugaman
4
Wins Head-to-Head
5 shared contests
Chastity Layne Slone
1
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Valerie Waugaman Chastity Layne Slone Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →