Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

William Sullivan vs Matthew Acton

WS
William Sullivan
2 8
10 head-to-head meetings
MA
Matthew Acton
Athlete A
WS
William Sullivan
United States Men's Physique
Athlete B
MA
Matthew Acton
United States Men's Physique
10 Shared Contests
2012 First Meeting
2015 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

William Sullivan vs Matthew Acton head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
10
William Sullivan
2 ahead
Matthew Acton
8 ahead
Span
2012–2015
At the Olympia
William Sullivan 0–1 Matthew Acton in 1

In 10 meetings, Matthew Acton finished ahead of William Sullivan 8 times to 2, including 1 Mr. Olympia showdown.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division William Sullivan Matthew Acton Winner
2015 IFBB Toronto Pro Supershow Men's Physique #11 #2 Matthew Acton
2014 Toronto Supershow Men's Physique #8 #1 Matthew Acton
2013 IFBB Pittsburgh Pro Men's Physique #9 #5 Matthew Acton
2013 IFBB New York Pro Men's Physique #5 #3 Matthew Acton
2013 Mr. Olympia Men's Physique #14 #3 Matthew Acton
2013 IFBB Europa Show of Champions Men's Physique #6 #13 William Sullivan
2013 Toronto Pro Supershow Men's Physique #3 #1 Matthew Acton
2013 Fort Lauderdale Cup Men's Physique #5 #1 Matthew Acton
2012 Valenti Gold Cup Men's Physique #3 #9 William Sullivan
2012 Houston Pro Men's Physique #18 #10 Matthew Acton

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

William Sullivan
2
Wins Head-to-Head
10 shared contests
Matthew Acton
8
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division William Sullivan Matthew Acton Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →