Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Ariel Khadr vs Jaclyn Baker

Ariel Khadr
Ariel Khadr
6 2
8 head-to-head meetings
Jaclyn Baker
Jaclyn Baker
Athlete A
Ariel Khadr
Ariel Khadr
United States Women's Fitness
Athlete B
Jaclyn Baker
Jaclyn Baker
United States Women's Fitness
8 Shared Contests
2018 First Meeting
2024 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 21, 2026

Ariel Khadr vs Jaclyn Baker head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Our full story on Ariel Khadr: Ariel Khadr Complete Profile: Height, Weight, Biography.

Meetings
8
Ariel Khadr
6 ahead
Jaclyn Baker
2 ahead
Span
2018–2024
At the Olympia
Ariel Khadr 3–2 Jaclyn Baker in 5

In 8 meetings, Ariel Khadr finished ahead of Jaclyn Baker 6 times to 2, including 5 at the Fitness Olympia.

Every contest Ariel Khadr and Jaclyn Baker both entered

Year Contest Division Ariel Khadr Jaclyn Baker Winner
2024 Arnold Classic Women's Fitness #1 #2 Ariel Khadr
2023 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #4 #3 Jaclyn Baker
2023 Arnold Classic Women's Fitness #1 #2 Ariel Khadr
2022 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #3 #2 Jaclyn Baker
2021 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #4 #5 Ariel Khadr
2021 Arnold Classic Women's Fitness #3 #4 Ariel Khadr
2020 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #4 #5 Ariel Khadr
2018 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #7 #10 Ariel Khadr

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Ariel Khadr and Jaclyn Baker meet that test 8 times. For scale, this database holds 19 recorded results for Ariel Khadr and 23 for Jaclyn Baker across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 21, 2026.

Ariel Khadr and Jaclyn Baker at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Ariel Khadr reached her competitive peak from 2015 to 2017, one of her strongest stretches (43% win rate across 7 contests in the window).

Jaclyn Baker reached her competitive peak from 2015 to 2016, one of her strongest stretches (33% win rate across 3 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Jaclyn Baker, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

Second at the Fitness Olympia in 2022, 2024 and 2025 and third in 2023. Four consecutive years in the top three of the biggest contest in her division.

The Arnold Classic took three attempts: runner-up in 2023, runner-up in 2024, winner in 2025. She also won the Miami Muscle Beach Pro in 2019.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.