Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Branch Warren vs Phil Heath

Branch Warren
Branch Warren
1 9
10 head-to-head meetings
Phil Heath
Phil Heath
Athlete A
Branch Warren
Branch Warren
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Phil Heath
Phil Heath
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
10 Shared Contests
2007 First Meeting
2015 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 13, 2026

Branch Warren vs Phil Heath head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
10
Branch Warren
1 ahead
Phil Heath
9 ahead
Span
2007–2015
At the Olympia
Branch Warren 1–6 Phil Heath in 7

In 10 meetings, Phil Heath finished ahead of Branch Warren 9 times to 1, including 7 Mr. Olympia showdowns.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Branch Warren Phil Heath Winner
2015 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #6 #1 Phil Heath
2014 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #6 #1 Phil Heath
2013 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #9 #1 Phil Heath
2012 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #5 #1 Phil Heath
2010 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #3 #2 Phil Heath
2010 Arnold Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #3 #2 Phil Heath
2009 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #5 Branch Warren
2008 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #5 #3 Phil Heath
2008 Arnold Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #4 #2 Phil Heath
2007 Arnold Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #7 #5 Phil Heath

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Branch Warren
1
Wins Head-to-Head
10 shared contests
Phil Heath
9
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Branch Warren Phil Heath Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →