Camala Rodriguez vs Candice Lewis-Carter
Camala Rodriguez 
Pick two different athletes to compare.
Camala Rodriguez vs Candice Lewis-Carter head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.
- Meetings
- 15
- Camala Rodriguez
- 5 ahead
- Candice Lewis-Carter
- 10 ahead
- Span
- 2012–2017
- At the Olympia
- Camala Rodriguez 1–4 Candice Lewis-Carter in 5
In 15 meetings, Candice Lewis-Carter finished ahead of Camala Rodriguez 10 times to 5, including 5 at the Figure Olympia.
Every contest Camala Rodriguez and Candice Lewis-Carter both entered
| Year | Contest | Division | Camala Rodriguez | Candice Lewis-Carter | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Mr. Olympia | Women's Figure | #12 | #3 | Candice Lewis-Carter |
| 2017 | Arnold Classic Australia | Women's Figure | #6 | #1 | Candice Lewis-Carter |
| 2017 | Arnold Classic | Women's Figure | #4 | #1 | Candice Lewis-Carter |
| 2016 | Mr. Olympia | Women's Figure | #6 | #2 | Candice Lewis-Carter |
| 2016 | Ms International | Women's Figure | #2 | #4 | Camala Rodriguez |
| 2016 | Arnold Classic Australia | Women's Figure | #4 | #2 | Candice Lewis-Carter |
| 2015 | Mr. Olympia | Women's Figure | #4 | #3 | Candice Lewis-Carter |
| 2015 | Ms International | Women's Figure | #1 | #2 | Camala Rodriguez |
| 2015 | Arnold Classic Australia | Women's Figure | #1 | #3 | Camala Rodriguez |
| 2014 | Mr. Olympia | Women's Figure | #13 | #3 | Candice Lewis-Carter |
| 2014 | Ms International | Women's Figure | #3 | #5 | Camala Rodriguez |
| 2013 | IFBB Omaha Pro | Women's Figure | #2 | #1 | Candice Lewis-Carter |
| 2013 | Mr. Olympia | Women's Figure | #7 | #9 | Camala Rodriguez |
| 2013 | Ms International | Women's Figure | #6 | #4 | Candice Lewis-Carter |
| 2012 | IFBB Fort Lauderdale Pro | Women's Figure | #3 | #1 | Candice Lewis-Carter |
How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Camala Rodriguez and Candice Lewis-Carter meet that test 15 times. For scale, this database holds 37 recorded results for Camala Rodriguez and 35 for Candice Lewis-Carter across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 22, 2026.
Camala Rodriguez and Candice Lewis-Carter at their peak
Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.
Camala Rodriguez reached her competitive peak around 2008, one of her strongest placement years.
Candice Lewis-Carter reached her competitive peak around 2008, one of her strongest placement years (100% win rate across 2 contests in the window).
Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.
Camala Rodriguez and Candice Lewis-Carter, beyond the scoreline
The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.
Camala Rodriguez
2015 is the season: the Ms. International and the Arnold Classic Australia, the Arnold's two figure titles, in one year. She was fourth at the Olympia the same season, her best finish there.
The rest of the wins run 2013 to 2014: the California State Pro, the Houston Pro, the New York Pro and the Pittsburgh Pro.
Candice Lewis-Carter
Back-to-back Arnold Classic titles in 2017 and 2018, with the Arnold Classic Australia in both of the same years. Four Arnold titles across two seasons.
The Olympia record reads third in 2014, third in 2015, second in 2016, third in 2017 and second in 2018. Five consecutive podiums is a longer run than most champions manage, and she was never higher than second.
Camala Rodriguez profile Candice Lewis-Carter profile Compare other athletes
Attribute Tug-of-War
Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.
Not enough data to compare
Career attributes could not be calculated for one or both athletes.
Career Overlap Timeline
Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.
Career timeline unavailable
We do not have enough dated contest results to draw a timeline.
Career Stats Comparison
These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.
Share This Comparison
Comparison unavailable
We could not load this comparison. This might be a temporary connection issue.
Choose two athletes to compare
Search above to compare career stats, head-to-head meetings, and shared contests.
This page counts finishing positions
Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.
- A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
- Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
- Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
- A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.