Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Chris Bumstead vs George Peterson

Chris Bumstead
Chris Bumstead
3 0
3 head-to-head meetings
George Peterson
George Peterson
Athlete A
Chris Bumstead
Chris Bumstead
Canada Men's Classic Physique
Athlete B
George Peterson
George Peterson
United States Men's 212 Bodybuilding
3 Shared Contests
2017 First Meeting
2019 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 23, 2026

Chris Bumstead vs George Peterson head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Our full story on Chris Bumstead: Chris Bumstead (CBum) – Complete Profile: Training, Diet, Height, Weight, Biography.

Meetings
3
Chris Bumstead
3 ahead
George Peterson
0 ahead
Span
2017–2019
At the Olympia
Chris Bumstead 3–0 George Peterson in 3

In 3 meetings, Chris Bumstead finished ahead of George Peterson 3 times to 0, including 3 at the Classic Physique Olympia.

Every contest Chris Bumstead and George Peterson both entered

Year Contest Division Chris Bumstead George Peterson Winner
2019 Mr. Olympia Men's Classic Physique #1 #3 Chris Bumstead
2018 Mr. Olympia Men's Classic Physique #2 #3 Chris Bumstead
2017 Mr. Olympia Men's Classic Physique #2 #3 Chris Bumstead

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Chris Bumstead and George Peterson meet that test 3 times. For scale, this database holds 16 recorded results for Chris Bumstead and 21 for George Peterson across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 23, 2026.

Chris Bumstead and George Peterson at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Chris Bumstead reached his competitive peak from 2019 to 2024 (6 years), winning 6 Olympia titles in Men's Classic Physique.

George Peterson reached his competitive peak from 2011 to 2013, one of his strongest stretches (17% win rate across 6 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

George Peterson, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

Peterson is one of very few competitors to reach an Olympia podium in two divisions. Third in Classic Physique in 2017, 2018 and 2019, then third in the 212 in 2020, the first year he entered it.

The nickname, Da Bull, described the build: 5 feet 7 inches and thickly muscled in a division that usually rewards line over mass. He won the Tampa Pro twice, in Classic Physique in 2017 and in the 212 in 2020, and was runner-up at the 2019 Arnold Classic.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.