Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Dana Linn Bailey vs Tycie Coppett

Dana Linn Bailey
Dana Linn Bailey
3 0
3 head-to-head meetings
Tycie Coppett
Tycie Coppett
Athlete A
Dana Linn Bailey
Dana Linn Bailey
United States Women's Physique
Athlete B
Tycie Coppett
Tycie Coppett
United States Women's Physique
3 Shared Contests
2013 First Meeting
2015 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 21, 2026

Dana Linn Bailey vs Tycie Coppett head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Our full story on Dana Linn Bailey: Dana Linn Bailey Complete Profile: Training, Diet, Height, Weight, Biography.

Meetings
3
Dana Linn Bailey
3 ahead
Tycie Coppett
0 ahead
Span
2013–2015
At the Olympia
Dana Linn Bailey 2–0 Tycie Coppett in 2

In 3 meetings, Dana Linn Bailey finished ahead of Tycie Coppett 3 times to 0, including 2 at the Women's Physique Olympia.

Every contest Dana Linn Bailey and Tycie Coppett both entered

Year Contest Division Dana Linn Bailey Tycie Coppett Winner
2015 Ms International Women's Physique #2 #3 Dana Linn Bailey
2014 Mr. Olympia Women's Physique #2 #3 Dana Linn Bailey
2013 Mr. Olympia Women's Physique #1 #2 Dana Linn Bailey

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Dana Linn Bailey and Tycie Coppett meet that test 3 times. For scale, this database holds 12 recorded results for Dana Linn Bailey and 19 for Tycie Coppett across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 21, 2026.

Dana Linn Bailey and Tycie Coppett at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Dana Linn Bailey reached her competitive peak from 2013 to 2013, winning 1 Olympia title in Women's Physique.

Tycie Coppett reached her competitive peak around 2006, one of her strongest placement years (100% win rate across 2 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.