Skip to main content
Performance-only peak comparison

Dana Linn Bailey vs Tycie Coppett: Prime Comparison

Compare two bodybuilders at their peak using Olympia-win prime windows and era-normalized scoring. No cultural-impact bonus is used here.

Era-adjusted board

Dana Linn Bailey prime vs Tycie Coppett prime

Same division comparison. Dana Linn Bailey scores 10.5 for 2013. Tycie Coppett scores 8.3 for 2006.

Same division comparison Cultural impact excluded
Dana Linn Bailey

Dana Linn Bailey

View profile
Prime window
2013
Prime score
10.5
Olympia wins
1
Prime win rate
75.0%
OFSI avg
0.000
Prime field avg
16.0

Women's Physique - division launch: 2013

Tycie Coppett

Tycie Coppett

View profile
Prime window
2006
Prime score
8.3
Olympia wins
0
Prime win rate
100.0%
OFSI avg
0.000
Prime field avg
0.0

Women's Physique - division launch: 2013

Score bars

Performance-only prime score

Prime score = Prime EAODS + prime competition score + prime consistency bonus. Cultural impact and historical bonuses are excluded.

  • Dana Linn Bailey: EAODS 4.0, competition 6.5, consistency 0.0.
  • Tycie Coppett: EAODS 0.0, competition 8.3, consistency 0.0.
  • Prime window = Olympia-win years only. Scores are performance-only: no cultural or historical component.
Limitations

What this comparison does not claim

OFSI is a field-size proxy. It does not measure the quality of each opponent, judging criteria, training technology, or public influence. The page is a deterministic comparison over database results, not a verdict generator.

  • Cross-division matchups are allowed and labeled as era comparison only.
  • Athletes with no Olympia title use a career-best three-year window and are labeled as such.
  • Classic Physique uses Classic-specific Olympia fields, with 2016 shown as the division launch year.
Methodology

How the prime score is built

The prime score is a performance-only total. It reuses the era-adjusted board's components for an athlete's Olympia-win prime window, with cultural and historical components deliberately removed so the comparison stays on the field of play.

  • Era-Adjusted Olympia Dominance: max 40.
  • Competition Record: max 20.
  • Consistency Bonus: max 10.
  • Cultural impact and historical components are excluded from the prime score.
  • Prime window = Olympia-win years only. Scores are performance-only: no cultural or historical component.
Methodology-based Figures are query-derived; the prime score follows a fixed, published weighting of era-adjusted Olympia dominance, competition record, and consistency over each athlete's Olympia-win prime window. Updated September 21, 2026