Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Dayana Cadeau vs Heather Armbrust

Dayana Cadeau
Dayana Cadeau
2 3
5 head-to-head meetings
HA
Heather Armbrust
Athlete A
Dayana Cadeau
Dayana Cadeau
Haiti Women's Bodybuilding
Athlete B
HA
Heather Armbrust
United States Women's Bodybuilding
5 Shared Contests
2007 First Meeting
2009 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 21, 2026

Dayana Cadeau vs Heather Armbrust head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
5
Dayana Cadeau
2 ahead
Heather Armbrust
3 ahead
Span
2007–2009
At the Olympia
Dayana Cadeau 2–1 Heather Armbrust in 3

In 5 meetings, Heather Armbrust finished ahead of Dayana Cadeau 3 times to 2, including 3 at the Ms. Olympia.

Every contest Dayana Cadeau and Heather Armbrust both entered

Year Contest Division Dayana Cadeau Heather Armbrust Winner
2009 Ms International Women's Bodybuilding #5 #4 Heather Armbrust
2009 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #8 #2 Heather Armbrust
2008 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #5 #14 Dayana Cadeau
2007 Ms International Women's Bodybuilding #6 #3 Heather Armbrust
2007 Ms. Olympia Women's Bodybuilding #2 #5 Dayana Cadeau

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Dayana Cadeau and Heather Armbrust meet that test 5 times. For scale, this database holds 35 recorded results for Dayana Cadeau and 13 for Heather Armbrust across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 21, 2026.

Dayana Cadeau and Heather Armbrust at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Dayana Cadeau reached her competitive peak from 1996 to 1998, one of her strongest stretches (17% win rate across 6 contests in the window).

Heather Armbrust reached her competitive peak from 2001 to 2002, one of her strongest stretches (25% win rate across 4 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Dayana Cadeau, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

Two Ms. International titles and four Olympia podiums: third in 2005, second in 2006 and 2007. She was also runner-up at the Ms. International in 2002, 2006 and 2008.

She competed in the lightweight class for most of her career and moved between weight categories as the division kept redrawing them.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.