Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Dennis Wolf vs Kevin English

Dennis Wolf
Dennis Wolf
1 0
1 head-to-head meetings
Kevin English
Kevin English
Athlete A
Dennis Wolf
Dennis Wolf
Germany Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Kevin English
Kevin English
United States Men's 212 Bodybuilding
1 Shared Contests
2008 First Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 1, 2026

Dennis Wolf vs Kevin English head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
1
Dennis Wolf
1 ahead
Kevin English
0 ahead
Span
2008
At the Olympia
Dennis Wolf 1–0 Kevin English in 1

Only 1 head-to-head meeting on record so far, including 1 at the Mr. Olympia, with Dennis Wolf ahead 1 to 0 - too thin to call a rivalry yet.

Every contest Dennis Wolf and Kevin English both entered

Year Contest Division Dennis Wolf Kevin English Winner
2008 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #4 #16 Dennis Wolf

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Dennis Wolf and Kevin English meet that test 1 time. For scale, this database holds 38 recorded results for Dennis Wolf and 19 for Kevin English across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 1, 2026.

Dennis Wolf and Kevin English at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Dennis Wolf reached his competitive peak from 2004 to 2006, one of his strongest stretches (29% win rate across 7 contests in the window).

Kevin English reached his competitive peak from 2008 to 2010, one of his strongest stretches (62% win rate across 8 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Dennis Wolf and Kevin English, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

Dennis Wolf

2014 was the season everything landed: the Arnold Classic, the Arnold Classic Europe and the EVLS Prague Pro. He had been runner-up at the Arnold in 2011 and 2012 before winning it.

His best Olympia finish is third in 2013, from ten appearances between 2006 and 2015, and he never placed outside the top six after 2007.

Kevin English

The Olympia record in the capped division reads second in 2008, then first, first and first. Three consecutive titles in a class that was still called the 202 Showdown when he started winning it and the 212 by the time he stopped.

The New York Pro was his other stronghold. He won it in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2012, which no other competitor in the division has matched.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.