Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Gary Clark vs Joe Walker

GC
Gary Clark
0 2
2 head-to-head meetings
Joe Walker
Joe Walker
Athlete A
GC
Gary Clark
United States Other Divisions
Athlete B
Joe Walker
Joe Walker
United Kingdom Other Divisions
2 Shared Contests
2015 First Meeting
2016 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Gary Clark vs Joe Walker head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
Gary Clark
0 ahead
Joe Walker
2 ahead
Span
2015–2016

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with Joe Walker (1) ahead 2 to 0 - too thin to call a rivalry yet.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Gary Clark Joe Walker Winner
2016 England Championships Masters 40+ #5 #2 Joe Walker
2015 Mr Britain Masters 40+ #5 #1 Joe Walker

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Gary Clark
0
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Joe Walker
2
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Gary Clark Joe Walker Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →