Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Heather Grace vs Natalia Abraham Coelho

Heather Grace
Heather Grace
0 4
4 head-to-head meetings
Natalia Abraham Coelho
Natalia Abraham Coelho
Athlete A
Heather Grace
Heather Grace
United States Women's Physique
Athlete B
Natalia Abraham Coelho
Natalia Abraham Coelho
United States Women's Physique
4 Shared Contests
2018 First Meeting
2019 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 22, 2026

Heather Grace vs Natalia Abraham Coelho head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Our full story on Natalia Abraham Coelho: Natalia Abraham Coelho Complete Profile: Height, Workout and Diet.

Meetings
4
Heather Grace
0 ahead
Natalia Abraham Coelho
4 ahead
Span
2018–2019
At the Olympia
Heather Grace 0–2 Natalia Abraham Coelho in 2

In 4 meetings, Natalia Abraham Coelho finished ahead of Heather Grace 4 times to 0, including 2 at the Women's Physique Olympia.

Every contest Heather Grace and Natalia Abraham Coelho both entered

Year Contest Division Heather Grace Natalia Abraham Coelho Winner
2019 IFBB Rising Phoenix Arizona Pro Women's Physique #10 #2 Natalia Abraham Coelho
2019 Mr. Olympia Women's Physique #12 #3 Natalia Abraham Coelho
2018 IFBB Rising Phoenix Arizona Pro Women's Physique #4 #1 Natalia Abraham Coelho
2018 Mr. Olympia Women's Physique #5 #2 Natalia Abraham Coelho

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Heather Grace and Natalia Abraham Coelho meet that test 4 times. For scale, this database holds 47 recorded results for Heather Grace and 51 for Natalia Abraham Coelho across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 22, 2026.

Heather Grace and Natalia Abraham Coelho at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Heather Grace reached her competitive peak around 2006, one of her strongest placement years.

Natalia Abraham Coelho reached her competitive peak from 2022 to 2025 (4 years), winning 2 Olympia titles in Women's Physique.

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Heather Grace, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

Back-to-back Olympia bronzes in 2016 and 2017, from six appearances between 2014 and 2019. 2017 was the fullest season: the Rising Phoenix Arizona Pro, the Hurricane Pro and third at the Arnold Classic.

She has also won in the masters classes, taking the Rising Phoenix and Hurricane masters titles in the same 2017 season.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.