Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Herbert Bagwell vs Jamel Keels

HB
Herbert Bagwell
1 1
2 head-to-head meetings
JK
Jamel Keels
Athlete A
HB
Herbert Bagwell
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
JK
Jamel Keels
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
2 Shared Contests
2003 First Meeting
2004 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Herbert Bagwell vs Jamel Keels head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
Herbert Bagwell
1 ahead
Jamel Keels
1 ahead
Span
2003–2004

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with Herbert Bagwell and Jamel Keels level at 1 each - too few to call.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Herbert Bagwell Jamel Keels Winner
2004 Musclemania Superbody Men's Open Bodybuilding #10 #3 Jamel Keels
2003 Musclemania New England Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #3 Herbert Bagwell

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Herbert Bagwell
1
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Jamel Keels
1
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Herbert Bagwell Jamel Keels Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →