Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

James Yates vs Kevin Reeder

James Yates
James Yates
0 2
2 head-to-head meetings
Kevin Reeder
Kevin Reeder
Athlete A
James Yates
James Yates
United States Men's Physique
Athlete B
Kevin Reeder
Kevin Reeder
United States Men's Physique
2 Shared Contests
2019 First Meeting
2020 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

James Yates vs Kevin Reeder head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
James Yates
0 ahead
Kevin Reeder
2 ahead
Span
2019–2020

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with Kevin Reeder ahead 2 to 0 - too thin to call a rivalry yet.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division James Yates Kevin Reeder Winner
2020 IFBB Pittsburgh Pro Masters Championships Masters 50+ #9 #2 Kevin Reeder
2019 IFBB San Antonio Pro Men's Physique #6 #1 Kevin Reeder

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

James Yates
0
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Kevin Reeder
2
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division James Yates Kevin Reeder Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →