Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Janet Tech vs Kyle Campbell

Janet Tech
Janet Tech
2 0
2 head-to-head meetings
Kyle Campbell
Kyle Campbell
Athlete A
Janet Tech
Janet Tech
United States Women's Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Kyle Campbell
Kyle Campbell
United States Women's Bodybuilding
2 Shared Contests
1987 First Meeting
1988 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Janet Tech vs Kyle Campbell head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
Janet Tech
2 ahead
Kyle Campbell
0 ahead
Span
1987–1988

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with Janet Tech ahead 2 to 0 - too thin to call a rivalry yet.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Janet Tech Kyle Campbell Winner
1988 Nationals Women's Bodybuilding #1 #4 Janet Tech
1987 Nationals Women's Bodybuilding #7 #13 Janet Tech

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Janet Tech
2
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Kyle Campbell
0
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Janet Tech Kyle Campbell Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →