Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Jay Matlock vs Mike Winters

JM
Jay Matlock
1 1
2 head-to-head meetings
Mike Winters
Mike Winters
Athlete A
JM
Jay Matlock
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Mike Winters
Mike Winters
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
2 Shared Contests
1991 First Meeting
1993 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Jay Matlock vs Mike Winters head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
2
Jay Matlock
1 ahead
Mike Winters
1 ahead
Span
1991–1993

Only 2 head-to-head meetings on record so far, with Jay Matlock and Mike Winters level at 1 each - too few to call.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Jay Matlock Mike Winters Winner
1993 Chicago Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #20 #17 Mike Winters
1991 Nationals Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #3 Jay Matlock

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Jay Matlock
1
Wins Head-to-Head
2 shared contests
Mike Winters
1
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Jay Matlock Mike Winters Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →