Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Kai Greene vs Roelly Winklaar

Kai Greene
Kai Greene
10 0
10 head-to-head meetings
Roelly Winklaar
Roelly Winklaar
Athlete A
Kai Greene
Kai Greene
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Roelly Winklaar
Roelly Winklaar
Curacao Men's Open Bodybuilding
10 Shared Contests
2010 First Meeting
2014 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 22, 2026

Kai Greene vs Roelly Winklaar head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Our full story on Kai Greene: Kai Greene Complete Profile: Workout and Diet Program.

Our full story on Roelly Winklaar: Roelly Winklaar – Complete Profile: Height, Weight, Biography.

Meetings
10
Kai Greene
10 ahead
Roelly Winklaar
0 ahead
Span
2010–2014
At the Olympia
Kai Greene 4–0 Roelly Winklaar in 4

In 10 meetings, Kai Greene finished ahead of Roelly Winklaar 10 times to 0, including 4 at the Mr. Olympia.

Every contest Kai Greene and Roelly Winklaar both entered

Year Contest Division Kai Greene Roelly Winklaar Winner
2014 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #12 Kai Greene
2013 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #7 Kai Greene
2013 Arnold Classic Europe Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #6 Kai Greene
2013 Arnold Classic Europe Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #6 Kai Greene
2012 IFBB Sheru Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #4 Kai Greene
2012 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #12 Kai Greene
2011 New York Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #9 Kai Greene
2010 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #7 #14 Kai Greene
2010 Grand Prix Australia Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #3 Kai Greene
2010 Arnold Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #7 Kai Greene

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Kai Greene and Roelly Winklaar meet that test 10 times. For scale, this database holds 39 recorded results for Kai Greene and 65 for Roelly Winklaar across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 22, 2026.

Kai Greene and Roelly Winklaar at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Kai Greene reached his competitive peak from 1996 to 1997, one of his strongest stretches (60% win rate across 5 contests in the window).

Roelly Winklaar reached his competitive peak from 2009 to 2010, one of his strongest stretches (40% win rate across 5 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.