Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Martin Holroyd vs Nigel Cox

Martin Holroyd
Martin Holroyd
1 2
3 head-to-head meetings
Nigel Cox
Nigel Cox
Athlete A
Martin Holroyd
Martin Holroyd
United Kingdom Other Divisions
Athlete B
Nigel Cox
Nigel Cox
United Kingdom Other Divisions
3 Shared Contests
2011 First Meeting
2012 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Martin Holroyd vs Nigel Cox head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
3
Martin Holroyd
1 ahead
Nigel Cox
2 ahead
Span
2011–2012

In 3 meetings, Nigel Cox finished ahead of Martin Holroyd 2 times to 1.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Martin Holroyd Nigel Cox Winner
2012 Mr Universe Masters 50+ #2 #1 Nigel Cox
2011 Mr Universe Masters 50+ #2 #5 Martin Holroyd
2011 UK Championships Masters 50+ #2 #1 Nigel Cox

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Martin Holroyd
1
Wins Head-to-Head
3 shared contests
Nigel Cox
2
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Martin Holroyd Nigel Cox Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →