Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Matthew Acton vs Sadik Hadzovic

MA
Matthew Acton
1 10
11 head-to-head meetings
Sadik Hadzovic
Sadik Hadzovic
Athlete A
MA
Matthew Acton
United States Men's Physique
Athlete B
Sadik Hadzovic
Sadik Hadzovic
United States Men's Physique
11 Shared Contests
2012 First Meeting
2015 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 21, 2026

Matthew Acton vs Sadik Hadzovic head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Our full story on Sadik Hadzovic: Sadik Hadzovic Complete Profile: Training, Diet, Height, Weight, Biography.

Meetings
11
Matthew Acton
1 ahead
Sadik Hadzovic
10 ahead
Span
2012–2015
At the Olympia
Matthew Acton 1–2 Sadik Hadzovic in 3

In 11 meetings, Sadik Hadzovic finished ahead of Matthew Acton 10 times to 1, including 3 at the Men's Physique Olympia.

Every contest Matthew Acton and Sadik Hadzovic both entered

Year Contest Division Matthew Acton Sadik Hadzovic Winner
2015 Mr. Olympia Men's Physique #11 #2 Sadik Hadzovic
2014 IFBB New York Pro Men's Physique #3 #2 Sadik Hadzovic
2014 Mr. Olympia Men's Physique #4 #2 Sadik Hadzovic
2013 IFBB Pittsburgh Pro Men's Physique #5 #4 Sadik Hadzovic
2013 IFBB New York Pro Men's Physique #3 #1 Sadik Hadzovic
2013 Mr. Olympia Men's Physique #3 #4 Matthew Acton
2013 IFBB Europa Show of Champions Men's Physique #13 #2 Sadik Hadzovic
2012 Valenti Gold Cup Men's Physique #9 #1 Sadik Hadzovic
2012 Orange County Muscle Classic Pro Men's Physique #12 #2 Sadik Hadzovic
2012 Houston Pro Men's Physique #10 #4 Sadik Hadzovic
2012 Greater Gulf States Pro Men's Physique #3 #2 Sadik Hadzovic

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Matthew Acton and Sadik Hadzovic meet that test 11 times. For scale, this database holds 41 recorded results for Matthew Acton and 20 for Sadik Hadzovic across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 21, 2026.

Matthew Acton and Sadik Hadzovic at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Matthew Acton reached his competitive peak from 2012 to 2014, his strongest placement years on record (24% win rate across 17 contests in the window).

Sadik Hadzovic reached his competitive peak from 2012 to 2013, one of his strongest stretches (25% win rate across 8 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.