Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Max Pangerl vs Uwe Seiter

MP
Max Pangerl
1 2
3 head-to-head meetings
US
Uwe Seiter
Athlete A
MP
Max Pangerl
United States Other Divisions
Athlete B
US
Uwe Seiter
United States Other Divisions
3 Shared Contests
1999 First Meeting
2001 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Max Pangerl vs Uwe Seiter head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
3
Max Pangerl
1 ahead
Uwe Seiter
2 ahead
Span
1999–2001

In 3 meetings, Uwe Seiter finished ahead of Max Pangerl 2 times to 1.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Max Pangerl Uwe Seiter Winner
2001 World Championships Masters #6 #3 Uwe Seiter
2000 World Championships Masters #2 #3 Max Pangerl
1999 World Championships Masters #6 #2 Uwe Seiter

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Max Pangerl
1
Wins Head-to-Head
3 shared contests
Uwe Seiter
2
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Max Pangerl Uwe Seiter Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →