Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Myriam Capes vs Tanji Johnson

Myriam Capes
Myriam Capes
3 6
9 head-to-head meetings
Tanji Johnson
Tanji Johnson
Athlete A
Myriam Capes
Myriam Capes
United States Women's Fitness
Athlete B
Tanji Johnson
Tanji Johnson
United States Women's Fitness
9 Shared Contests
2011 First Meeting
2016 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 21, 2026

Myriam Capes vs Tanji Johnson head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
9
Myriam Capes
3 ahead
Tanji Johnson
6 ahead
Span
2011–2016
At the Olympia
Myriam Capes 1–4 Tanji Johnson in 5

In 9 meetings, Tanji Johnson finished ahead of Myriam Capes 6 times to 3, including 5 at the Fitness Olympia.

Every contest Myriam Capes and Tanji Johnson both entered

Year Contest Division Myriam Capes Tanji Johnson Winner
2016 Arnold Classic South Africa Women's Fitness #4 #6 Myriam Capes
2015 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #3 #2 Tanji Johnson
2014 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #5 #3 Tanji Johnson
2013 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #4 #3 Tanji Johnson
2013 Arnold Classic Europe Women's Fitness #5 #1 Tanji Johnson
2012 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #4 #5 Myriam Capes
2012 Flex Pro Women's Fitness #3 #4 Myriam Capes
2012 Arnold Classic Women's Fitness #6 #5 Tanji Johnson
2011 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #3 #2 Tanji Johnson

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Myriam Capes and Tanji Johnson meet that test 9 times. For scale, this database holds 14 recorded results for Myriam Capes and 20 for Tanji Johnson across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 21, 2026.

Myriam Capes and Tanji Johnson at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Myriam Capes reached her competitive peak from 2011 to 2013, her strongest placement years on record (14% win rate across 7 contests in the window).

Tanji Johnson reached her competitive peak around 2001, one of her strongest placement years.

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Myriam Capes and Tanji Johnson, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

Myriam Capes

The podium record is the whole case: third in 2011, fourth in 2012 and 2013, fifth in 2014, third in 2015, second in 2017 and third in 2018. Consistently among the best three or four in the world for eight years.

She won the Valenti Gold Cup in 2012 and the Tampa Pro in 2017, and was runner-up at the Toronto Pro Supershow in 2016.

Tanji Johnson

Six Olympia podiums, all of them second or third: runner-up in 2009, 2011, 2015 and 2016, third in 2013 and 2014. Nobody in the fitness division has stood that close to the title that often without taking it.

2013 was her best season, with the Arnold Classic fitness title and the Arnold Classic Europe in the same year. She won the Vancouver Pro in 2015 and the Emerald Cup Pro back in 2005.

The Tanji Johnson Classic is a sanctioned professional show carrying her name, which is a form of recognition the placings do not capture.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.