Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Sheronica Henton vs Zama Benta

Sheronica Henton
Sheronica Henton
1 2
3 head-to-head meetings
Zama Benta
Zama Benta
Athlete A
Sheronica Henton
Sheronica Henton
United States Women's Physique
Athlete B
Zama Benta
Zama Benta
Brazil Women's Physique
3 Shared Contests
2024 First Meeting
2025 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated September 21, 2026

Sheronica Henton vs Zama Benta head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
3
Sheronica Henton
1 ahead
Zama Benta
2 ahead
Span
2024–2025
At the Olympia
Sheronica Henton 1–1 Zama Benta in 2

In 3 meetings, Zama Benta finished ahead of Sheronica Henton 2 times to 1, including 2 at the Women's Physique Olympia.

Every contest Sheronica Henton and Zama Benta both entered

Year Contest Division Sheronica Henton Zama Benta Winner
2025 Mr. Olympia Women's Physique #5 #3 Zama Benta
2024 IFBB Texas Pro Women's Physique #4 #1 Zama Benta
2024 Mr. Olympia Women's Physique #3 #5 Sheronica Henton

How this is counted: a meeting is one contest where both athletes were judged in the same division. Standing on the same stage in different divisions is not a meeting, because the two were never scored against each other. Sheronica Henton and Zama Benta meet that test 3 times. For scale, this database holds 34 recorded results for Sheronica Henton and 6 for Zama Benta across their full careers. Counted from the contest record as of September 21, 2026.

Sheronica Henton and Zama Benta at their peak

Peak window = the athlete's Olympia-title years where available, otherwise their best-placement years. Derived from recorded contest results. It is a span of years, not a rating.

Sheronica Henton reached her competitive peak from 2012 to 2013, one of her strongest stretches (83% win rate across 6 contests in the window).

Zama Benta reached her competitive peak from 2023 to 2025, her strongest placement years on record (50% win rate across 6 contests in the window).

Score these two prime windows against each other on Prime vs Prime, where Olympia dominance is weighted for the size of the field each athlete beat.

Sheronica Henton and Zama Benta, beyond the scoreline

The part of this matchup a results table cannot hold, written by hand rather than derived from the record.

Sheronica Henton

The Olympia record climbs late: sixteenth in 2015, sixth in 2016, fifth in 2017, twelfth in 2018, then third in 2024 and fifth in 2025, nine years after the first appearance.

She was runner-up at the Arnold Classic in 2017 and 2019 and won the New York Pro in 2024 and the Texas Pro in 2026.

Zama Benta

Placing third in Women's Physique at the Mr. Olympia in 2023, fifth in 2024 and third again in 2025. The wins came in between, at the Tampa Pro and the Texas Pro in 2024 and the Tampa Pro again in 2025.

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Each bar runs from an athlete's first recorded contest to their last, so the stretch where the two bars cross is the period both were competing. The marks on the bars are the years they met in the same division, one mark per year however many times they met in it. Careers that never cross can still be read against each other on career totals; they just cannot produce a head-to-head record.

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

These are career-long figures, drawn from the results we hold for each athlete rather than only the contests the two shared, which is why a pair who never met still has something to compare. Where the two differ, the row marks the stronger figure: the higher number, except on Career Start and Best Placement, where the lower one is better and takes the mark. A row the two are level on marks neither.

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.