Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Tracy Teitelbaum vs Mark Malanga

Tracy Teitelbaum
Tracy Teitelbaum
4 3
7 head-to-head meetings
Mark Malanga
Mark Malanga
Athlete A
Tracy Teitelbaum
Tracy Teitelbaum
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Mark Malanga
Mark Malanga
United States Men's 212 Bodybuilding
7 Shared Contests
2010 First Meeting
2016 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Tracy Teitelbaum vs Mark Malanga head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
7
Tracy Teitelbaum
4 ahead
Mark Malanga
3 ahead
Span
2010–2016

In 7 meetings, Tracy Teitelbaum finished ahead of Mark Malanga 4 times to 3.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Tracy Teitelbaum Mark Malanga Winner
2016 Western Regional Championships Masters 50+ #2 #1 Mark Malanga
2016 Western Regional Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #3 #2 Mark Malanga
2014 Western Regional Championships Masters 50+ #7 #5 Mark Malanga
2012 Western Regional Championships Masters 50+ #5 #6 Tracy Teitelbaum
2012 Western Regional Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #2 Tracy Teitelbaum
2010 Western Regional Championships Masters 50+ #5 #7 Tracy Teitelbaum
2010 Western Regional Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #2 #3 Tracy Teitelbaum

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Tracy Teitelbaum
4
Wins Head-to-Head
7 shared contests
Mark Malanga
3
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Tracy Teitelbaum Mark Malanga Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →