Skip to main content
Performance-only peak comparison

Ramon Rocha Queiroz vs Terrence Ruffin: Prime Comparison

Compare two bodybuilders at their peak using Olympia-win prime windows and era-normalized scoring. No cultural-impact bonus is used here.

Era-adjusted board

Ramon Rocha Queiroz prime vs Terrence Ruffin prime

Same division comparison. Ramon Rocha Queiroz scores 16.2 for 2025. Terrence Ruffin scores 8.2 for 2014.

Same division comparison Cultural impact excluded
Ramon Rocha Queiroz

Ramon Rocha Queiroz

View profile
Prime window
2025
Prime score
16.2
Olympia wins
1
Prime win rate
100.0%
OFSI avg
1.000
Prime field avg
56.0

Men's Classic Physique - division launch: 2016

Terrence Ruffin

Terrence Ruffin

View profile
Prime window
2014
Prime score
8.2
Olympia wins
0
Prime win rate
100.0%
OFSI avg
0.000
Prime field avg
0.0

Men's Classic Physique - division launch: 2016

Score bars

Performance-only prime score

Prime score = Prime EAODS + prime competition score + prime consistency bonus. Cultural impact and historical bonuses are excluded.

  • Ramon Rocha Queiroz: EAODS 8.0, competition 8.2, consistency 0.0.
  • Terrence Ruffin: EAODS 0.0, competition 8.2, consistency 0.0.
  • Prime window = Olympia-win years only. Scores are performance-only: no cultural or historical component.
Limitations

What this comparison does not claim

OFSI is a field-size proxy. It does not measure the quality of each opponent, judging criteria, training technology, or public influence. The page is a deterministic comparison over database results, not a verdict generator.

  • Cross-division matchups are allowed and labeled as era comparison only.
  • Athletes with no Olympia title use a career-best three-year window and are labeled as such.
  • Classic Physique uses Classic-specific Olympia fields, with 2016 shown as the division launch year.
Methodology

How the prime score is built

The prime score is a performance-only total. It reuses the era-adjusted board's components for an athlete's Olympia-win prime window, with cultural and historical components deliberately removed so the comparison stays on the field of play.

  • Era-Adjusted Olympia Dominance: max 40.
  • Competition Record: max 20.
  • Consistency Bonus: max 10.
  • Cultural impact and historical components are excluded from the prime score.
  • Prime window = Olympia-win years only. Scores are performance-only: no cultural or historical component.
Methodology-based Figures are query-derived; the prime score follows a fixed, published weighting of era-adjusted Olympia dominance, competition record, and consistency over each athlete's Olympia-win prime window. Updated September 1, 2026