Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Krista Dunn vs Candice Lewis-Carter

Krista Dunn
Krista Dunn
0 9
9 head-to-head meetings
Candice Lewis-Carter
Candice Lewis-Carter
Athlete A
Krista Dunn
Krista Dunn
United States Women's Physique
Athlete B
Candice Lewis-Carter
Candice Lewis-Carter
United States Women's Figure
9 Shared Contests
2012 First Meeting
2016 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Krista Dunn vs Candice Lewis-Carter head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
9
Krista Dunn
0 ahead
Candice Lewis-Carter
9 ahead
Span
2012–2016
At the Olympia
Krista Dunn 0–2 Candice Lewis-Carter in 2

In 9 meetings, Candice Lewis-Carter finished ahead of Krista Dunn 9 times to 0, including 2 Mr. Olympia showdowns.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Krista Dunn Candice Lewis-Carter Winner
2016 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #16 #2 Candice Lewis-Carter
2016 Rising Phoenix Arizona Pro Women's Figure #5 #1 Candice Lewis-Carter
2014 IFBB St Louis Pro Women's Figure #6 #1 Candice Lewis-Carter
2014 Mr. Olympia Women's Figure #16 #3 Candice Lewis-Carter
2013 IFBB Omaha Pro Women's Figure #13 #1 Candice Lewis-Carter
2012 IFBB Fort Lauderdale Pro Women's Figure #9 #1 Candice Lewis-Carter
2012 Pro World Championships Women's Figure #7 #1 Candice Lewis-Carter
2012 Masters Olympia Women's Figure #7 #1 Candice Lewis-Carter
2012 Miami Pro Women's Figure #7 #1 Candice Lewis-Carter

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Krista Dunn
0
Wins Head-to-Head
9 shared contests
Candice Lewis-Carter
9
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Krista Dunn Candice Lewis-Carter Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →