Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Tanji Johnson vs Myriam Capes

Tanji Johnson
Tanji Johnson
6 3
9 head-to-head meetings
Myriam Capes
Myriam Capes
Athlete A
Tanji Johnson
Tanji Johnson
United States Women's Fitness
Athlete B
Myriam Capes
Myriam Capes
United States Women's Fitness
9 Shared Contests
2011 First Meeting
2016 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Tanji Johnson vs Myriam Capes head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
9
Tanji Johnson
6 ahead
Myriam Capes
3 ahead
Span
2011–2016
At the Olympia
Tanji Johnson 4–1 Myriam Capes in 5

In 9 meetings, Tanji Johnson finished ahead of Myriam Capes 6 times to 3, including 5 Mr. Olympia showdowns.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Tanji Johnson Myriam Capes Winner
2016 Arnold Classic South Africa Women's Fitness #6 #4 Myriam Capes
2015 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #2 #3 Tanji Johnson
2014 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #3 #5 Tanji Johnson
2013 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #3 #4 Tanji Johnson
2013 Arnold Classic Europe Women's Fitness #1 #5 Tanji Johnson
2012 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #5 #4 Myriam Capes
2012 Flex Pro Women's Fitness #4 #3 Myriam Capes
2012 Arnold Classic Women's Fitness #5 #6 Tanji Johnson
2011 Mr. Olympia Women's Fitness #2 #3 Tanji Johnson

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Tanji Johnson
6
Wins Head-to-Head
9 shared contests
Myriam Capes
3
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Tanji Johnson Myriam Capes Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →