Skip to main content
Head-to-head record

Ben Pakulski vs Brandon Curry

Ben Pakulski
Ben Pakulski
7 2
9 head-to-head meetings
Brandon Curry
Brandon Curry
Athlete A
Ben Pakulski
Ben Pakulski
Canada Men's Open Bodybuilding
Athlete B
Brandon Curry
Brandon Curry
United States Men's Open Bodybuilding
9 Shared Contests
2012 First Meeting
2016 Last Meeting
Query-derived Compiled from contest-result records and cached for performance; community flags are reviewed before any change. Updated August 8, 2026

Ben Pakulski vs Brandon Curry head-to-head record and every decided contest between them on record.

Meetings
9
Ben Pakulski
7 ahead
Brandon Curry
2 ahead
Span
2012–2016
At the Olympia
Ben Pakulski 1–0 Brandon Curry in 1

In 9 meetings, Ben Pakulski finished ahead of Brandon Curry 7 times to 2, including 1 Mr. Olympia showdown.

Head-to-Head Meetings

Year Contest Division Ben Pakulski Brandon Curry Winner
2016 IFBB Vancouver Pro Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #2 Ben Pakulski
2016 Mr. Olympia Men's Open Bodybuilding #14 #16 Ben Pakulski
2016 Vancouver Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #1 #2 Ben Pakulski
2016 Kuwait Pro Championships Men's Open Bodybuilding #8 #11 Ben Pakulski
2016 Arnold Classic Europe Men's Open Bodybuilding #11 #13 Ben Pakulski
2015 Arnold Classic Australia Men's Open Bodybuilding #7 #5 Brandon Curry
2015 Arnold Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #8 #7 Brandon Curry
2014 Arnold Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #7 #8 Ben Pakulski
2012 Arnold Classic Men's Open Bodybuilding #4 #7 Ben Pakulski

Head-to-Head at Shared Contests

Ben Pakulski
7
Wins Head-to-Head
9 shared contests
Brandon Curry
2
Wins Head-to-Head

Attribute Tug-of-War

Each bar splits a metric by each athlete's share of their combined total. A centered bar means they are level.

Career Overlap Timeline

Shared Contest

Career Stats Comparison

Shared Contest History

Year Contest Division Ben Pakulski Brandon Curry Winner

Share This Comparison

Method

This page counts finishing positions

Every figure here comes from where each athlete placed in the contest record. Judging sheets and point spreads are not in the database, so a comparison tells you who finished higher on the night. It does not tell you by how much, or how close the call was.

  • A head-to-head result needs both athletes at the same contest in the same division. Two athletes on the same stage in different divisions were never judged against each other, so that show is not counted as a meeting.
  • Only contests both athletes actually entered can be settled here. Careers that never overlapped produce a side-by-side record and no head-to-head, because there is nothing to count.
  • Career totals cover the results we hold. A missing regional or amateur show lowers a total; it never invents one.
  • A shared placement is left as a tie. It is reported separately rather than split between the two athletes.

Cite / CSV / Embed

Browse all widgets →