HYROX Finish Time Predictor
Race-result-informed predictions from your running and gym benchmarks
Enter Your Details
Predict your HYROX finish time from 5K pace, gym benchmarks, and division
Per-Station Breakdown
| Station | Estimated Time |
|---|---|
How the Finish Time Predictor Works
The predictor uses your 5K run time as the primary input because running accounts for 45-55% of total HYROX race time. Your 5K pace is extrapolated across eight 1-kilometer run legs with a cumulative fatigue factor that reflects real-world slowdown as athletes alternate between running and functional fitness stations. Later runs are estimated 3-8% slower than the first run depending on your aerobic base.
When you provide optional gym benchmarks, the model refines station-specific estimates. A stronger deadlift relative to bodyweight correlates with faster sled push and sled pull splits. Your rowing 1K time maps almost directly to the rowing station. SkiErg benchmarks carry the highest correlation to actual SkiErg station time of any input in the model.
The RoxZone transition estimate covers movement between the run track and each station, including the short indoor running segments within the venue. For Open division the RoxZone average is approximately 5:20 across all eight transitions. Division-specific equipment weights are applied so that Open and Pro predictions reflect actual competition loads.
What Drives Your HYROX Finish Time
Of all inputs, 5K time explains roughly 65% of finish time variance in population data. The remaining variance is split between station efficiency (about 25%) and RoxZone transitions (about 10%). This means that if you want a faster finish time, improving your running is still the highest-leverage investment, but most athletes plateau their running before optimizing stations.
The sled push and sled pull together account for the largest single chunk of station time for most athletes. These stations have the highest coefficient of variation in the dataset, meaning the spread between slow and fast athletes is largest here. Targeted sled training produces the most predictable time improvements of any station.
Wall balls are the station where energy cost is most underestimated. 100 reps at competition height feels manageable in the gym but arrives at the end of the race when glycogen stores are depleted. Athletes who practice wall balls at the end of long training sessions, not the beginning, consistently outperform their benchmarked predictions.